Maverick Senate candidate
Gains among disgruntled Republicans
By
M.L. Johnson, Associated Press Writer | March 12, 2006
PROVIDENCE, R.I. --Republican Senate candidate Stephen
Laffey has developed a reputation for being outrageous.
He once
told a newspaper columnist that God wanted him to run for
mayor of Cranston.
When
journalists noticed that he had digitally erased a former
friend from photographs on the Web site for his Senate
campaign, he suggested aliens may have been responsible.
But
although Laffey jokes abound among Rhode Island's political
insiders, he is mounting a serious campaign for the Senate
seat held by fellow Republican Lincoln Chafee.
Republican leaders clinging to their five-seat majority in
the Senate support the politically moderate Chafee and worry
that Laffey could win the primary only to lose a general
election in this heavily Democratic state.
But
other Republicans angry with Chafee for refusing to back
President Bush on everything from tax cuts to his nomination
of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court have begun lining up
behind Laffey.
The
pro-business Club for Growth endorsed the former investment
banker and has spent tens of thousands of dollars in recent
months on television ads supporting him. The National Review
Online, a conservative publication, recently endorsed Laffey,
saying that although it does not agree with him on energy
issues he provides a palatable alternative to Chafee.
Perhaps
more importantly, local Republican groups dissatisfied with
Chafee are starting to back Laffey, whose visceral appeal
seems more important than his specific policy proposals.
The
Republican Town Committee in Exeter, Chafee's hometown,
endorsed Laffey last month. Then-chairman William Devanney
said he was impressed by what he called the mayor's
conservative Republican approach.
"(Chafee) hasn't been a real voice for the Republican
party," Devanney said. "I think he's taken the Democratic
view more often."
George
Resnick, chairman of the Johnston Republican Town Committee,
said the eight or so members who voted to endorse Laffey
were unanimous in their choice.
"They
believe that the senator has voted against the president on
a majority of issues that they consider important," he said.
(Chafee didn't even vote for Bush for president in the 2004
election, instead writing in his father, George H.W. Bush.)
Nationwide, a handful of incumbent senators face primary
challenges, but Laffey seems to present the greatest threat
of an upset, said Dan Ronayne, spokesman for the National
Republican Senatorial Committee.
Republican candidates in Rhode Island must walk a fine line.
The state has more than three times as many registered
Democrats as Republicans.
The
winner of the state's Republican primary will face either
Secretary of State Matt Brown or former Attorney General
Sheldon Whitehouse in the general election, and several
statewide polls predict either Democrat would defeat Laffey.
That
adds up to a tough choice for Republican voters, said Peter
Ubertaccio, a political science professor at Stonehill
College in Easton, Mass., who follows national Senate races.
"Do
you go with your heart, and your heart might be with Steve
Laffey, or do you go with your intellect, your mind and say,
'We need at all costs to hold onto our majority in the
Senate and Lincoln Chafee can do that?'" Ubertaccio said.
Several
national Republican groups have made the utilitarian choice.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee, which works to
re-elect incumbents, has spent about $150,000 on Chafee's
behalf. The Republican Majority for Choice and the
Republican Main Street Partnership, which supports moderate
candidates, also pledged to raise money for him.
With
hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a campaign barely
begun, tension has been heightened by the fact that there
are no reliable independent polls in the race.
Brown
University produces the only independently funded poll in
the state. But Darrell West, the political scientist who
runs it, is no longer including questions about the
Republican primary.
Rhode
Island has so few registered Republicans -- about 71,000 in
a state with more than 1 million people -- that the
university would have to make thousands of phone calls to
get a reliable sample, West said. That's too expensive.
In
addition, independents can register as a Democrat or
Republican at the polls on the day of the primary and vote
immediately. That can lead to the unexpected, said Robert
Blendon, who teaches polling at Harvard University's Kennedy
School of Government.
For
example, independents who don't normally vote elected Jesse
Ventura as governor of Minnesota in 1998.
Without
reliable polls, analysts often look to an incumbant's
approval rating to predict the outcome, Blendon said. A
recent poll by the Benenson Strategy Group for Brown's
campaign put Chafee's approval rating at 70 percent and
Laffey's at 34 percent.
But
that's among voters overall, and Blendon said Republicans
angered by such things as Chafee's vote against the war in
Iraq may feel differently.
"If they
really think he doesn't deserve another term among
Republicans," Blendon said, "then they are going to vote for
anyone who breathes."